 | Alfred Owen Aldridge - 1984 - 340 páginas
...striking parallel between the Social Contract and Rights of Man is revealed in Paine's charge that "the error of those who reason by precedents drawn from antiquity respecting the rights of man, is that they do not go far enough into antiquity. They do not go the whole way."26 Rousseau in... | |
 | Kirk F. Koerner - 1985 - 396 páginas
[ Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido. ] | |
 | Thomas Paine - 1987 - 548 páginas
[ Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido. ] | |
 | Thomas Paine - 1992 - 240 páginas
[ Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido. ] | |
 | Jonathan Wordsworth - 1993 - 264 páginas
[ Lo sentimos, el contenido de esta página está restringido. ] | |
 | Thomas Paine - 1995 - 944 páginas
...National Assembly of France as the basis on which the constitution of France is built. This he calls "paltry and blurred sheets of paper about the rights...precedents drawn from antiquity, respecting the rights of man, is, that they do not go far enough into antiquity. They do not go the whole way. They stop in... | |
 | Thomas Paine - 1996 - 242 páginas
...man has any rights? If he does, then he must mean that there are no such things as rights anywhere, and that he has none himself; for who is there in...Burke means to admit that man has rights, the question * An account of the expedition to Versailles may be seen in No. 13 of the Revolution de Paris containing... | |
 | V. Norskov Olsen - 1996 - 116 páginas
...defended the constitutional attempts of France and America to guarantee human rights. Wrote Paine: "The error of those who reason by precedents drawn from antiquity, respecting the rights of man, is that they do not go far enough into antiquity. They do not go the whole way. They stop in some... | |
| |
National Assembly of France as the basis on which the constitution of France is built. This he calls "paltry and blurred sheets of paper about the rights of man." — Does Mr. Burke mean to deny that man has any rights? If he does, then he must mean that... 
