 | Frank Lentricchia - 1980 - 406 páginas
...classification."39 Or this: "In separating language from speaking we are at the same time separating : (1) what is social from what is individual; and (2) what is essential from what is accessory and more or less accidental. Language is not a function of the speaker. . . ."40 Or this: "the distinguishing... | |
 | Geoffrey Galt Harpham - 1992 - 344 páginas
...cultural, or personal context. "In separating language from speaking we are at the same time separating: (1) what is social from what is individual; and (2) what is essential from what is accessory and more or less accidental" (Course in General Linguistics 14). No position could be more at odds with... | |
 | Jeffrey C. Alexander, Steven Seidman - 1990 - 388 páginas
...only within a collectivity. In separating language from speaking we are at the same time separating: (1) what is social from what is individual; and (2) what is essential from what is accessory and more or less accidental. Language is not a function of the speaker; it is a product that is passively... | |
 | Юрий Михайлович Лотман - 1990 - 306 páginas
...collectivity. By distinguishing between the language itself and speech, we distinguish at the same time: I) what is social from what is individual, and 2) what is essential from what is ancillary and more or less accidental. 6 Starting from these premises Saussure formulated his main... | |
 | Michel Pêcheux - 1995 - 276 páginas
...analysis: "By distinguishing between the language itself and speech, we distinguish at the same time: (1) what is social from what is individual, and (2) what is essential from what is ancillary and more or less accidental" (Saussure 1983: 13-14). The study of language, which once purported... | |
 | Marcia Moraes - 1996 - 180 páginas
...(parole). He argues that [i]n separating language from speaking we are at the same time separating: (1) what is social from what is individual; and (2) what is essential from what is accessory and more or less accidental. Language is not a function of the speaker; it is a product that is passively... | |
 | H. G. Widdowson - 1996 - 152 páginas
...collectivity. In separating language [langue] from speaking [parole] we are at the same time separating: (i) what is social from what is individual; and (2) what is essential from what is accessory and more or less accidental. Language [langue] is not a function of the speaker; it is a product that is... | |
 | Richard Kearney, Mara Rainwater - 1996 - 506 páginas
...collectivity. By distinguishing between the language itself and speech, we distinguish at the same time: (1) what is social from what is individual, and (2) what is essential from what is ancillary and more or less accidental. The language itself is not a function of the speaker. It is... | |
 | Vicki Kirby - 1997 - 214 páginas
...opposite of parole because, "[i]n separating language from speaking we are at the same time separating: (1) what is social from what is individual; and (2) what is essential from what is accessory and more or less accidental" (Saussure 1974: 14). Earlier, Saussure rendered the notion of agency a more... | |
 | Victor E. Taylor, Charles E. Winquist - 1998 - 840 páginas
...only within a collectivity. In separating language from speaking we are at the same time separating: (1) what is social from what is individual; and (2) what is essential from what is accessory and more or less accidental. Language is not a function of the speaker; it is a product that is passively... | |
| |
In separating language from speaking we are at the same time separating: (1) what is social from what is individual; and (2) what is essential from what is accessory and more or less accidental. 
