Managing for Results, 2005John M. Kamensky, Albert Morales Rowman & Littlefield, 2005 - 514 páginas The 'managing for results' movement that began in the early 1990s has now reached adolescence and is creating new challenges for government managers. After spending years creating planning and performance-measuring systems, managers and policy makers now need to focus on how to use performance information to make data-driven decisions. Managing Results for 2005 describes--through a series of case studies--the progress being made in federal, state, and local governments in managing for results. Part I increases our understanding about the potential use of performance information in government. It starts with a chapter on how government leaders can overcome obstacles to using performance information. Another chapter presents a comprehensive framework for tying performance to the budget process. The book provides specific examples of how performance information has been used to dramatically improve program outcomes. Part II presents case studies on the use of performance information to improve results in a range of federal agencies, in Texas state government, and in the City of Baltimore. As pioneering efforts, these examples do not all present success stories; nevertheless, the lessons learned will be instructive to public managers as the 'managing for results' movement advances toward maturity. |
Contenido
From Useful Measures to Measures Used | 1 |
Understanding the Potential of Using Performance Information | 15 |
Performance Management for Career Executives A Start Where You Are Use What You Have Guide | 17 |
Linking Performance and Budgeting Opportunities in the Federal Budget Process | 83 |
EReporting Using Managing for Results Data to Strengthen Democratic Accountability | 141 |
How Federal Programs Use Outcome Information Opportunities for Federal Managers | 197 |
Lessons in the Use of Performance Information | 275 |
Strategies for Using State Information Measuring and Improving Program Performance | 277 |
Setting Performance Targets Lessons from the Workforce Investment Act System | 351 |
Collaboration and Performance Management in Network Settings Lessons from Three Watershed Governance EffortS | 379 |
Using a Performance Budgeting System Lessons from the Texas Experience | 425 |
The Baltimore CitiStat Program Performance and Accountability | 465 |
About the Contributors | 499 |
About the IBM Center for The Business of Government | 509 |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
accountability achieve action activities addition Administration analysis annual approach appropriations areas Assessment assistance authority Baltimore better budget Business Center changes CitiStat citizens collaborative collected communication Congress cost create decisions Department designed develop Education effective efforts environmental established evaluation example executive expected federal agencies federal government focus formance funding goals GPRA Health housing identify implementation important improve increased indicators individual initial issues legislative levels management systems meet ment monitoring objectives Office operations organizations Outcome Data participants percent performance information performance management performance measures plans political practices presented problems progress Public Administration questions received Recommendation regional relationship Research responsibility schools scores serve specific staff standards strategic success tion understand units University Washington