Managing for Results, 2005John M. Kamensky, Albert Morales Rowman & Littlefield, 2005 - 514 páginas The 'managing for results' movement that began in the early 1990s has now reached adolescence and is creating new challenges for government managers. After spending years creating planning and performance-measuring systems, managers and policy makers now need to focus on how to use performance information to make data-driven decisions. Managing Results for 2005 describes--through a series of case studies--the progress being made in federal, state, and local governments in managing for results. Part I increases our understanding about the potential use of performance information in government. It starts with a chapter on how government leaders can overcome obstacles to using performance information. Another chapter presents a comprehensive framework for tying performance to the budget process. The book provides specific examples of how performance information has been used to dramatically improve program outcomes. Part II presents case studies on the use of performance information to improve results in a range of federal agencies, in Texas state government, and in the City of Baltimore. As pioneering efforts, these examples do not all present success stories; nevertheless, the lessons learned will be instructive to public managers as the 'managing for results' movement advances toward maturity. |
Contenido
From Useful Measures to Measures Used | 1 |
Understanding the Potential of Using Performance Information | 15 |
Performance Management for Career Executives A Start Where You Are Use What You Have Guide | 17 |
Linking Performance and Budgeting Opportunities in the Federal Budget Process | 83 |
EReporting Using Managing for Results Data to Strengthen Democratic Accountability | 141 |
How Federal Programs Use Outcome Information Opportunities for Federal Managers | 197 |
Lessons in the Use of Performance Information | 275 |
Strategies for Using State Information Measuring and Improving Program Performance | 277 |
Setting Performance Targets Lessons from the Workforce Investment Act System | 351 |
Collaboration and Performance Management in Network Settings Lessons from Three Watershed Governance EffortS | 379 |
Using a Performance Budgeting System Lessons from the Texas Experience | 425 |
The Baltimore CitiStat Program Performance and Accountability | 465 |
About the Contributors | 499 |
About the IBM Center for The Business of Government | 509 |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Términos y frases comunes
AASHTO Academy of Public accountability achieve action activities agency's allocate analysis annual reports areas Assessment Baltimore City budget process CitiStat citizens collaborative collected CompStat Congress cost decisions develop e-government e-reporting Education effective efforts environmental evaluation example federal agencies federal government federal programs field office focus focused formance funding GPRA grant IBM Center identify implementation Improving Government Performance issues Lake Tahoe legislative levels Managing for Results mandates Mayor O'Malley ment monitoring National Academy NHTSA organizations Outcome Data outcome information participants percent performance data performance goals performance indicators performance information performance management systems performance measures performance reports performance targets performance-based performance-based budgeting performance-informed budgeting problems program managers Public Administration public managers public reporting Research scores specific staff standards strategic planning Texas Texas Legislature Tillamook Tillamook Bay Tillamook County tion U.S. Department Washington watershed