Can Workers Have a Voice?: The Politics of Deindustrialization in PittsburghPennsylvania State University Press, 1993 - 232 páginas Early in the 1970s, the U.S. began to lose its position as unquestioned leader of the world economy. The industrial sector felt the strain of international competition, and by the 1980s massive plant shutdowns were common. Pittsburgh experienced these years as a time of both triumph and cataclysmic collapse. While the city transformed itself from a blue-collar steel town into a postmodern, high-tech corporate center, it saw nearly 100,000 industrial jobs disappear. Despite the unprecedented loss of jobs, few Pittsburgh workers were willing to take on the awesome power of U.S. Steel, Westinghouse, or Mellon Bank. Those who did attempt to resist the tide of change failed. Why was this so? Dale Hathaway seeks an answer by looking at three groups of steelworkers and worker allies that mounted highly visible challenges to corporate management--the Network/DMS, the Tri-State Conference on Steel, and the Mon Valley Unemployed Committee. None succeeded in besting Goliath, but Hathaway contends their efforts can show us why industrial workers are reluctant to "fight City Hall." The decisions that led to Pittsburgh's economic transformation, he argues, were not inevitable and others could have been made given a different political climate. But the balance of power favored a few corporate leaders whose decisions were made free from public scrutiny and independent from their employees and the surrounding community. This balance of power, according to Hathaway, best explains why so few workers chose to resist the economic onslaught they confronted in the 1980s. It is too late for the steelworkers of Pittsburgh to save their communities. However, as the U.S. adjusts to the global economy, similar decisions will be made affecting communities all across the nation. Who will make these decisions? Will they be made by a few or by many? Convinced of the need for thoroughgoing political change, Hathaway concludes that such decisions must be made democratically--that workers must have a voice in their own future. |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-3 de 90
... U.S. Steel did complete significant modernization of its Mon Valley Works with the completion of a continuous caster . This modernization brought U.S. Steel to world - class levels of technology , giving it an ability to produce all its raw ...
... steel mills . U.S. Steel continued to promise future investment . In 1979 , as part of a consent decree negotiated with the Environmental Protection Agency , U.S. Steel's Roderick had pledged : " U.S. Steel is committed to remain- ing in ...
... steel produc- tion impossible by exposing the figures behind U.S. Steel's logic . The steel industry in the United States had never been competitive . U.S. Steel was created in 1901 in a deal financed by J. P. Morgan that merged several ...
Contenido
Pittsburghs Economic Transformation | 25 |
The Prophetic Ministry Takes on Corporate Evil | 49 |
Who Decides? Uncovering Hidden DecisionMaking | 161 |
Derechos de autor | |
Otras 2 secciones no mostradas
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Can Workers Have A Voice?: The Politics of Deindustrialization in Pittsburgh Dale A. Hathaway Vista previa limitada - 2010 |
Can Workers Have a Voice?: The Politics of Deindustrialization in Pittsburgh Dale A. Hathaway Sin vista previa disponible - 1989 |