The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform

Portada
Georgetown University Press, 2008 M03 7 - 264 páginas

Efficiency. Innovation. Results. Accountability. These, advocates claim, are the fruits of performance management. In recent decades government organizations have eagerly embraced the performance model—but the rush to reform has not delivered as promised.

Drawing on research from state and federal levels, Moynihan illustrates how governments have emphasized some aspects of performance management—such as building measurement systems to acquire more performance data—but have neglected wider organizational change that would facilitate the use of such information. In his analysis of why and how governments in the United States have made the move to performance systems, Moynihan identifies agency leadership, culture, and resources as keys to better implementation, goal-based learning, and improved outcomes.

How do governments use the performance information generated under performance systems? Moynihan develops a model of interactive dialogue to highlight how performance data, which promised to optimize decision making and policy change for the public's benefit, has often been used selectively to serve the interests of particular agencies and individuals, undermining attempts at interagency problem solving and reform.

A valuable resource for public administration scholars and administrators, The Dynamics of Performance Management offers fresh insight into how government organizations can better achieve their public service goals.

Dentro del libro

Páginas seleccionadas

Contenido

Introduction
1
Chapter 1
3
Chapter 2
26
Chapter 3
39
Chapter 4
58
Chapter 5
75
Chapter 6
95
Chapter 7
118
Chapter 9
163
Chapter 10
189
Appendix A
211
Appendix B
214
Appendix C
221
Bibliography
225
Index
241
Derechos de autor

Chapter 8
139

Otras ediciones - Ver todas

Términos y frases comunes

Pasajes populares

Página 28 - Act are to— (1) improve the confidence of the American people in the capability of the Federal Government, by systematically holding Federal agencies accountable for achieving program results; (2) initiate program performance reform with a series of pilot projects in setting program goals, measuring program performance against those goals, and reporting publicly on their progress; (3) improve Federal program effectiveness and public accountability by promoting a new focus on results, service quality,...
Página 28 - Congress finds that — (1) waste and inefficiency in Federal programs undermine the confidence of the American people in the Government and reduces the Federal Government's ability to address adequately vital public needs...
Página 28 - Government and reduces the Federal Government's ability to address adequately vital public needs; (2) Federal managers are seriously disadvantaged in their efforts to improve program efficiency and effectiveness, because of insufficient articulation of program goals and inadequate information on program performance; and (3) Congressional policymaking, spending decisions and program oversight are seriously handicapped by insufficient attention to program performance and results.
Página 222 - Does the agency regularly collect timely and credible performance information, including information from key program partners, and use it to manage the program and improve performance?
Página 222 - ... managers and program partners (including grantees, subgrantees, contractors, cost-sharing partners, and other government partners) held accountable for cost, schedule, and performance results? 3. Are funds (Federal and partners') obligated in a timely manner and spent for the intended purpose? 4. Does the program have procedures (eg, competitive sourcing/cost comparisons, IT improvements, appropriate incentives) to measure and achieve efficiencies and cost effectiveness in program execution?...
Página 96 - On what basis shall it be decided to allocate X dollars to Activity A instead of Activity B?"1 Although several attempts have been made to meet this challenge,2 not one has come close to succeeding.
Página 221 - Does the program address a specific and existing problem, interest, or need? 3. Is the program designed so that it is not redundant or duplicative of any other federal, state, local, or private effort? 4. Is the program design free of major flaws that would limit the program's effectiveness or efficiency? 5. Is the program design effectively targeted, so that resources will reach intended beneficiaries and/or otherwise address the program's purpose...
Página 221 - Does the program have a limited number of specific long-term performance measures that focus on outcomes and meaningfully reflect the purpose of the program?
Página 114 - ... refers to a particular value or characteristic used to measure output or outcome; (5) "program activity" means a specific activity related to the mission of the Postal Service; and (6) "program evaluation" means an assessment, through objective measurement and systematic analysis, of the manner and extent to which Postal Service programs achieve intended objectives.
Página 33 - Management (1995), explains, delegation of authority means giving agency managers the maximum feasible authority needed to make their units productive — or, in the alternative, subjecting them to a minimum of constraints. Hence, delegation of authority requires operating budgets to be stripped to the minimum needed to motivate and inspire subordinates. Under responsibility budgeting the ideal operating budget...

Acerca del autor (2008)

Donald P. Moynihan is an associate professor of public affairs at the La Follette School of Public Affairs at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Información bibliográfica